AgentOps Leadership Checklist (30-60-90 Day Plan) Goal: Deploy AI assistants/agents in a way that improves throughput WITHOUT degrading quality, security, or accountability. 30 DAYS: Establish control and visibility (baseline) 1) Approved tools list - Pick 1–2 sanctioned coding assistants (e.g., IDE-based) and 1 sanctioned chat workspace. - Enforce SSO/SCIM where available; disable personal accounts for work data. 2) Data rules (one page) - Define what must NEVER be pasted into prompts (secrets, private keys, customer PII, credentials). - Define what is allowed (public docs, internal docs with permissioned access, synthetic examples). 3) Workflow scope - Choose 2–3 workflows to instrument first (e.g., PR drafting, incident summaries, support reply drafts). - Write a simple rule: “AI can propose; a named human owns outcomes.” 4) Logging & audit baseline - Start capturing metadata: user/team, tool, model/version, repository/workflow, timestamp, cost/usage counters. - Decide retention policy (e.g., 30–90 days for raw logs; longer for aggregated metrics). 60 DAYS: Add guardrails and measurement (make it reliable) 5) Introduce an AI RACI - For each workflow, assign Responsible (AI/tool), Accountable (human owner), Consulted, Informed. - Publish in the team handbook. 6) Implement gates for high-risk actions - Require human approval for: external customer communication, auth/billing changes, security-sensitive diffs, data exports. - Add secret scanning and policy checks to CI for AI-assisted PRs. 7) Evaluation harness (small but real) - Build a gold dataset: 50–200 real examples per workflow. - Score outputs for accuracy, completeness, policy adherence, and citation/source correctness (if using RAG). 8) Metrics dashboard v1 - Adoption: AI-assisted PR share; % tickets drafted with AI. - Quality: rollback share, defect rate, re-open rate for tickets. - Efficiency: cycle time, MTTR, support handle time. - Cost: AI spend per resolved unit (ticket, PR, incident). 90 DAYS: Scale safely (make it compounding) 9) Expand to tool-using agents carefully - Start with read-only agents (summarize, classify, propose) before write-capable agents (create PRs, file tickets). - Use least privilege: constrain tool access to specific APIs and scopes. 10) “Agent incident” process - Any harmful or high-severity failure triggers a postmortem within 5 business days. - Track root cause categories: bad retrieval, permissions, prompt weakness, ambiguous policy, missing tests. 11) Cost governance - Set budgets per workflow (not just per team). - Add alerts for spend spikes and latency degradations. 12) Review standards that scale with risk - Define review checklists for generated code: tests required, lint/static analysis, security review triggers. - Track whether AI increases senior-engineer review load; fix via better constraints and templates. Success criteria after 90 days: - You can quantify AI’s impact on at least two outcome metrics (e.g., MTTR down 15%, support deflection up 8%). - AI-assisted changes do NOT have higher rollback/defect rates than baseline. - Security can demonstrate controls: approved tools, auditability, retention settings, and prompt/data policies. - Leaders can answer: “Where is AI used, what does it touch, how do we know it’s working, and who owns failures?”